On October 24, 2007, the Securities, Insurance, and Investment Subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs held a hearing on "International Accounting Standards: Opportunities, Challenges, and Global Convergence Issues" in Washington, DC [see the hearing web page]. Here are some highlights of the testimony provided at that hearing:
Robert H. Herz, Chairman of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB): "[W]e do not support permitting U.S. companies a choice between IFRS and U.S. GAAP for any extended period of time. Rather, we believe it would be preferable to move all U.S. public companies to an improved IFRS over a transition period of several years following the blueprint we are advocating be developed."
Charles E. Landes, Vice President, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA): "I want to state as directly as possible that the AICPA supports the goal of a single set of high-quality, comprehensive accounting standards to be used by public companies in the preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world. The debate or question should no longer be whether we move to convergence of high quality accounting standards, but how soon we can accomplish convergence. . . Is there still hard work to be done towards convergence? Yes. Will there be bumps in the road as we take this journey? Absolutely. But it is a journey that must be taken."
In summary: The FASB, the AICPA, and other providers of testimony expressed strong support for the movement of all public companies away from U.S GAAP to an improved versions of IFRS as the only acceptable set of standards to use in preparing financial statements. And all agreed that the transition process would work better if it was based on a well-conceived "blueprint," which has yet to be developed. But while the AICPA and SEC expressed strong support for the SEC's proposal to eliminate the U.S. GAAP reconciliation requirement for foreign private issuers using IFRSs and the SEC's Concept Release regarding giving U.S. issuers an option to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS, other hearing participants were generally either neutral or opposed to the SEC accepting IFRS-compliant filings as-is prior to the development of an improved version of IFRSs, with respect to which U.S. GAAP will either be converged or simply no longer relevant.
Commentary: Regardless of what the SEC does in the short-term, the long-term trend is unmistakable: U.S. public companies (and possibly privately-held companies as well) will eventually use a version of IFRSs that will be significantly different from either current IFRSs or current U.S. GAAP. And it is that yet-undefined set of standards that U.S. financial executives need to begin preparing themselves and their organizations for, knowing that both U.S. GAAP and IFRSs will undergo rapid, profound change along the way.

SEC to FPIs: No need to reconcile IFRSs to U.S. GAAP
On November 15, 2007, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted unanimously to accept from "foreign private issuers" (FPIs) financial statements that are prepared using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) without reconciliation to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The SEC's vote represents the official adoption of a rule change that had been proposed earlier this year (see my blog post on the proposal here).
FPIs are private-sector companies based outside of the United States that, for a variety of possible reasons, fall under the jurisdiction of the SEC. Prior to the SEC's vote, FPIs had been required to file either (1) financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or (2) financial statements prepared in accordance with other standards plus a reconciliation of those statements to U.S. GAAP. Now, FPIs that prepare financial statements using IFRSs as issued by the IASB will no longer need to supply a U.S. GAAP reconciliation -- IFRS statements will be accepted "as is" by the SEC.
In contrast to the multiple filing options available to FPIs, domestic companies that fall under the jurisdiction of the SEC have no choice regarding the standards that they must use when preparing financial statements. All U.S. issuers continue to be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The SEC's action had been widely expected. However, at the meeting in which the SEC voted to adopt its previously-proposed rule change, the SEC's staff introduced two "surprises," both of which were approved as a result of the subsequent vote. The first was a recommendation that the rule change should be effective immediately. This significantly accelerated the attainment of the objective of the SEC's "IFRS Roadmap," which had targeted the reconciliation requirement for FPIs who prepare financial statements using IFRSs to be removed by 2009. Thus, as adopted, the rule change provides IFRS-filing FPIs with relief from the requirement to provide a U.S. GAAP reconciliation for financial statements covering any fiscal year that ends after November 15, 2007.
The second surprise gives FPIs yet another filing option, albeit a temporary one. During the next two years, the SEC agreed to accept from FPIs financial statements prepared using IFRSs as adopted by the European Union if those statements are accompanied by a reconciliation to IFRSs as issued by the IASB. While this concession to European issuers is likely to have virtually no impact in practice, it was a moral victory for those who had advocated such permissiveness in the face of widespread opposition to the SEC's recognition of so-called "jurisdictional IFRSs."
The SEC's press release regarding its action also contains some surprises. First, there is no mention of the temporary concession made for FPIs preparing financial statements in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. Second, the press release characterizes the SEC's action rather oddly -- the headline reads "SEC Takes Action to Improve Consistency of Disclosure to U.S. Investors in Foreign Companies." I'm baffled by the "Consistency" part.
From a historical perspective, the SEC's decision is truly unprecedented. No issuer has ever been allowed to prepare financial statements using standards other than U.S. GAAP without being required to reconcile those statements to U.S. GAAP. The decision is also unusual in that the SEC is giving some issuers a significant filing option that is unavailable to other issuers, i.e., foreign issuers may now choose between IFRSs and U.S. GAAP while domestic issuers must continue to use U.S. GAAP.
For anyone who wants to see and hear exactly what transpired in Thursday's meeting, here's a link to a recorded version of the original webcast. The portion of the meeting related to the rule change for FPIs begins 55 minutes into the recording and ends at 2:34. Bonus: Watch for an "America's Funniest Videos" moment between 1:54 and 1:55 during Commissioner Atkins' Q&A.
Next Week: My post-Thanksgiving post will address the implications of the SEC's action for both public and private U.S. companies.
Posted by Bruce Pounder | Permalink