The Convergence Blog is the first and only comprehensive source of news and expert commentary on the global convergence of financial reporting standards from the perspective of U.S. GAAP preparers. Unlike other websites,
The Convergence Blog specializes in delivering actionable information that you can use to manage the growing impact of Convergence on your company, your department, and your career.
The Genuine Reason for Allowing U.S. Companies to Use IFRSs
My blog post of January 6, 2008 explored two phenomena that have led many people in the United States to mis-perceive rationales for why we should consider allowing U.S.-listed companies to use IFRSs. One of those phenomena was the widespread conversion to IFRSs by countries other than the U.S., and the other was the SEC's recent decision to accept IFRS-compliant financial statements as-is from foreign companies that are listed in the U.S. Those phenomena are distinct from each other and have different genuine rationales from each other. Those phenomena are also distinct from the SEC's expressed interest in allowing domestic public companies to use IFRSs, which has its own genuine rationale. In today's blog post, we finally get to the genuine reason for allowing U.S. companies to use IFRSs. And we'll see that once again, to the surprise of many, the genuine rationale for allowing U.S. companies to use IFRSs is not the patently-incorrect assertion that "IFRSs are superior to U.S. GAAP."
The genuine rationale for allowing U.S. companies to use IFRSs is that at least some U.S. companies will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage if they are not permitted to use the same financial reporting standards that their competitors use. Specifically, U.S. companies that are forced to use U.S. GAAP instead of IFRSs
We still have many mis-perceptions to debunk regarding the role of IFRSs in the phenomenon of Convergence. Stay tuned.
Posted by Bruce Pounder | Permalink